Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renz Baluyot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renz Baluyot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability standards and is mostly self-written (WP:NOTE, WP:AUTOBIO, WP:SOAP, WP:COI) Pcwendland (talk) 13:45, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough significant coverage from third-party sources. 舎利弗 (talk) 21:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to remind all parties that using multiple accounts to create an illusion of support is prohibited in Wikipedia, and may result to a block or a ban. (Please see WP:SOCK) I have the very strong suspicion that User:Mahleen27, User:Mcluhanesque, User:Irene dolphin and User:Mariean2net are very well the same person, or at least persons under the influence of the same person (WP:MEAT). I thought moving a userspace talk page to the mainspace was very irregular. The content of the talk page was suspicious as well. While it might not be hard evidence, but one can find striking similarities in the user pages I have provided. I have not so far found any evidence of multiple-account misuse apart from the said talk page (note the timestamps) to merit a sockpuppet investigation, but please consider yourself warned. 舎利弗 (talk) 21:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 17:22, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 18:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, no evidence of notability Amortias (T)(C) 22:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.